Friday, 10 January 2020

YOU CAN SEE THE THINKING. FIRST THE DOCTORS NOW THE SPORTS MEN.


It was last year that Tidemarks became aware of the existence of the National School of government responsible for “learning and development programmes in a uniform public service with the objective of developing a professional, responsive and capable public sector, driven by the imperative of a developmental state”. What ever this might mean and even if the minister of sports, Nathi Mthethwa is not an alumnus he is surely a shoo-in for that School’s award for the top political policy in 2019 with his program to nationalise sport and recreation. This asinine idea ticks all the boxes of excruciatingly stupid government interference. It will assuredly cost far more than anyone estimates. It gladdens the heart of old Marxists who still firmly believe that if you annoy the white people enough they will all leave the country and forget to close their bank accounts It inserts layers of bureaucracy between every participant, spectator, sponsor to the certain detriment of everyone. It makes every sporting professional a state employee (earning the same amount?) It will finally enable the abolition of the Springbok emblem. And wont that make the country pleased? Err. NO!
Reportedly the draft regulation which has been published, drones on about the powers of a minister to make everything better. Without actually defining “better”. Do we really need Nathi and his spooks poking about in the bar at the bowling club checking that the honours boards give equal space to the permanently offended? Since there is really not much kudos to be gained by hanging about for a photo op at the medal ceremony of the eastern Free State Winter Jukskei tournament, his motivation must be money. But the driver behind advertising and sponsporship deals are tax benefits. And so it’s rather hard to picture the system where a bank (for example) pays the costs of a team owned by the state.
The questions roll on and on
In the national budget, Sports is lumped together with the equally small Arts and Culture department. The budgeted employment cost for these civil servants this fiscal year is R7.6bn. This includes an amount of R3.5bn for goods and services (think: drink, food, feather beds and flights). For this amount the nation sleeps easily knowing that someone from the ministry is always there to ensure that we sing from the same page and play the right games with the correct teams.  In striking contrast, the amount available for distributing to and supporting their clients (the citizens actually doing stuff) is exactly half of what the bureaucrats are costing. Already the signs are clear about who does best in this deal. And it isn’t the meisie from Mamelodi eager to pit herself against the rest of the world.
It's alarming how our lives and language so swiftly and easily absorb words and concepts that were utterly unthinkable. Suddenly we're are getting used to the idea of an electricity distribution “war room” where wise men make informed and capable decisions about who should return to the stone age and for how long. Its worth reminding everyone that Eskom is managed by people most of whom who don’t know the difference between WhatsApp and Watt Amps. Remember the Chairman explaining how a conveyor belt worked? And yet there’s a tired resignation. Eskom are doing their best in trying circumstances. It's not their fault that a conveyor belt has parted, coal does get wet when it rains, the contractors have obviously left us with faulty systems and how were we to know? We have a new boss now. He’ll fix it. Just as soon as he arranges his departure package. He has a meeting with Mr Molefe.
Its comforting to watch the school leaving high achievers being paraded past the press for a ministerial photo op. Those young folks know exactly the value and meaning of an improbable 9 distinctions but were happy and capable to game the system to cut a few corners. The politicos however were salivating with self-congratulation and ensured that no dared to ask what next?  Like: Do we have a quota system for the high demand university places or does ability trump race?
James Greener
Friday 10th January 2020